Me, My Shop, My Businesses, My Game, My Life: CONTROL RUNS THE WORLD

Senin, 09 September 2024

CONTROL RUNS THE WORLD

Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.

Ah — Rupes Nigra is not a family name, but a legendary place from old maps.

🌑 What is Rupes Nigra?

Latin for “Black Rock.”
It first appeared in the 16th-century cartography of the Arctic.
Described as a huge magnetic black rock at the North Pole, surrounded by whirlpools.
Sailors and early geographers (like Gerardus Mercator in his 1569 map) believed the Earth’s compass was drawn to this rock.
It was thought to rise 33 leagues (about 150 km) high and be surrounded by 4 powerful rivers that created whirlpools.

🔮 Symbolism & Myth

Magnetism → the rock was said to explain why compasses pointed north.
Center of the world → some writers linked it to Ultima Thule or even a gateway to the inner Earth.
Alchemy & occult → “black stone” often symbolized hidden knowledge, Saturn, or the prima materia.
In esoteric traditions, Rupes Nigra represents the mystical axis mundi (world axis), a cosmic center.

🗺️ Why it disappeared

Later explorers never found it.
By the 17th–18th centuries, maps started removing Rupes Nigra as the Arctic became better charted.
Today it is treated as a mythical cartographic invention, blending Norse sagas, medieval legends, and imagination.

👉

Who controls the world 🌎?

https://youtu.be/OcBynl35Cts?si=Cp0vMq25b0jNVDif

Be very useful to the government that government starts depending on you.

Politicians are puppets.. ( they have a wealthy friend/ donor before get elected)

Wars are good for Business. Contohnya sebuah negara diserang gandumnya. Sebelumnya kita Uda masuk ke gandum.. lalu kita jadi untung dari gandum yang harganya meningkat drastis karena kebutuhan gandum...

We don't want conflicts to end

1. Own everything

2. Ingratiate yourself to the politicians

3. Buy politicians ( 1-2)

4. Get profit from the influence

5. Rinse and repeat 🔁

He said : it's not who president is.. it's who's controlling the wallet of the president

They don't want to be anywhere on the radar

Black 🖤 Rock 🪨

Marketing: kasi fee / help desires orang yang pengambil keputusan. Apakah itu sekolahkan anak, bangun rumah 🏡 dst. Tidak selalu uang. Or normally offer 3* lipat gaji. Pasti jalan

250 YEARS CYCLE

You're referring to civilizational cycles or great historical rhythms—where empires rise and fall roughly every 250 years, often followed by a 10–20 year transitional period of unrest, confusion, or rebuilding.

This idea is supported by many thinkers such as:

Ibn Khaldun (Muqaddimah): Rise and fall of dynasties (~120–150 years)
Glubb Pasha: "The Fate of Empires" (~250-year life cycle)
Strauss–Howe Generational Theory (USA): 80–100 year cycles with major transitions
Toynbee & Spengler: Civilizational life cycles (birth–growth–decay)

🔁 General 250-Year Empire Cycle

A simplified structure:

Phase	Years	Description
1. Rise	0–50	Strong leaders, expansion, moral unity
2. Growth	50–100	Wealth, trade, innovation, institutions grow
3. Peak/Golden Age	100–150	Cultural & scientific flourishing, luxury
4. Decline	150–200	Corruption, decadence, weakening borders
5. Crisis/Collapse	200–250	Civil unrest, war, economic collapse
→ Transition Period	+10–20	New system or empire rises, chaos/stabilization

🏛 Examples of 250-Year Patterns

Empire/Civilization	Approximate Duration	Transition Period
Roman Republic → Empire	509–27 BC → 27 BC–476 AD	476–500s (Dark Age begins)
Mongol Empire	1206–1368	Yuan collapse, Ming rise
Ottoman High Period	1299–1571 (Rise to dominance) → Slow decline	Post-WWI (1922) collapse
British Empire	~1700s–1950s	1945–1970: Decolonization
United States (Rise)	1776–2026?	Possible major shift in 2020–2040?

🌍 Current Global Cycle?

Post-WWII Order (1945) → nearing 80 years old
Many believe we’re now entering a major 10–20 year global transition (2020–2040):
- Power shifts (West → East?)
- Rise of digital empires
- Climate + economic transformation
- Old systems breaking, new ones forming

🧭 How This Can Be Useful for You

If you're making long-term plans (business, real estate, migration, legacy projects), this lens can help you:

Anticipate global shifts (e.g. decline of Western dominance?)
Build in the rising phase of new powers (e.g. UAE, Southeast Asia, Africa)
Avoid investing in crumbling systems
Focus on innovation, culture, and security

what international law says about Israel’s June 13, 2025 strike on Iran, and how it is generally judged.

⚖️ UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW:

The use of military force is governed by the United Nations Charter, especially:

🔹 Article 2(4) – Prohibits the use of force

“All Members shall refrain… from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.”

🔹 Exceptions:

Self-defense – Article 51 allows it only:
- If a country is attacked first, or
- If there is an imminent threat that can be proven.
UN Security Council approval – Legal if the UN authorizes it (like in Libya 2011 or Iraq 1991).

🔍 Was Israel’s Strike Legal?

❌ No UN Authorization

Israel did not get permission from the UN Security Council.
So it must justify the strike under self-defense.

❓ Was It Self-Defense?

Israel was not directly attacked by Iran at the time of the strike.
Israel claimed it was preempting Iran’s nuclear weapon development.
But under international law, preemptive self-defense is only legal if the threat is:
- Imminent
- Unavoidable
- Proven with clear evidence

📌 Problem: Israel has not publicly provided evidence that Iran was about to attack.

🔴 Conclusion (Legal Analysis):

Unless Israel proves that Iran was about to launch a nuclear strike (which it hasn't), the June 13 attack:
- Violates Article 2(4) of the UN Charter.
- Could be considered an act of aggression — a serious breach of international law.

🌍 What Do Experts Say?

UN officials and international law scholars have criticized the strike as illegal unless more evidence is presented.
It’s also a dangerous precedent, because if one country attacks another based on suspicion, many wars could be justified that way.

🔁 Iran's Response?

Iran’s missile retaliation, although also violent, would likely be seen as lawful under Article 51 — as a response to an armed attack.

✅ Summary:

Country	Legal Justification	Verdict
Israel	Claims "preemptive self-defense"	Likely illegal
Iran	Retaliation to being attacked	Possibly legal under self-defense

In this current case — starting June 13, 2025 — let’s look clearly and fairly at who did what, and how it affects moral judgment.

📍 What Happened:

June 13, 2025 – Israel Struck First

Israel launched a massive military operation inside Iran, called Operation Rising Lion.
Targets: Iran’s nuclear sites, military infrastructure, and top scientists and commanders.
Result: Hundreds killed, including civilians and scientists. This was inside Iran’s own borders.

Same Day and After – Iran Retaliated

Iran launched missiles and drones at Israel in response.
Most missiles were intercepted, but some caused injuries in Israeli cities.
Iran said this was retaliation, not an offensive war.

🧭 Morally, What Does That Mean?

🇮🇱 Israel

Struck first with a deadly, large-scale attack.
It did not ask the UN, and the action was not defensive in that moment.
Many experts say this violated international law, unless it can prove an imminent nuclear threat.

🇮🇷 Iran

Responded after being attacked.
Its response was military, but some missiles risked hitting civilians, which is also questionable under international law.
However, retaliation after a strike is different from starting a war.

⚖️ Honest Judgment Based on This Case:

In this specific situation, Israel clearly initiated the current wave of violence on June 13.
Iran's retaliation, while dangerous and risky, was a response, not the starting act.
This doesn’t mean Iran is perfect — but in this round, Israel acted as the aggressor.

🤝 What About Peace?

Many ordinary people in both countries don’t want this war. They want safety, jobs, and freedom — not bombs.

The deeper problem is not who is "good" or "bad" — it’s a long cycle of fear, power, revenge, and control. Breaking that requires more than weapons.

JUNE 13 ISRAEL 🇮🇱 IRAN 🇮🇷

Yes — on June 13, 2025, Israel launched a major military operation inside Iran, called Operation Rising Lion:

Israel carried out airstrikes on 100+ sites, including nuclear facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Isfahan), military bases, missile launchers, and at least one residential compound in Tehran. Over 200 Iranian military figures and nuclear scientists were killed (en.wikipedia.org).
The campaign involved around 200 fighter jets and multiple waves, backed by covert Mossad drone sabotage operations that disabled air defenses beforehand (en.wikipedia.org).

So yes — in the current escalation, Israel struck Iran first.

🔁 How Iran Responded

Later on June 13, Iran retaliated with a combined salvo of ~150 ballistic missiles and over 100 drones at Israel in what was dubbed Operation True Promise 3. The attacks caused injuries (22 Israelis injured) but were largely intercepted (en.wikipedia.org).

📝 Timeline

Date	Event
June 13	Israel launches Operation Rising Lion
Same day	Iran responds with missile & drone attack

⚖️ Why This Matters

This marks a significant shift: a rare instance of Israel initiating cross-border strikes into Iran—not just proxy confrontations in Syria or Lebanon.
It represents a new phase of direct conflict, escalating from years of a covert "shadow war."

WESTERNERS GO AFTER OILS?

It's a complex and controversial topic, but here’s a grounded, balanced perspective:

Historical Context:

Yes — there is strong evidence that Western involvement in the Middle East has often been motivated, at least in part, by access to oil and strategic resources.

Examples:

1953 Iran (CIA Coup): The U.S. and U.K. orchestrated a coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh after he nationalized Iran's oil. Western oil interests were central to that move.
Iraq War (2003): Officially about weapons of mass destruction (which were never found), many analysts and critics argue that oil and regional influence were major hidden motives.
Libya (2011): NATO’s intervention was framed as humanitarian, but again, Libya has vast oil reserves. Some scholars believe strategic energy interests played a role.

But It’s Not That Simple:

Western powers have multiple motives: national security, alliances (like with Israel or Saudi Arabia), anti-terrorism, arms trade, democracy promotion (sometimes), and yes — economic interest, especially oil.
Local governments and regional powers also play major roles in these conflicts. It’s not purely Western-driven.

So, to answer you simply:

Yes, oil and control of energy routes have been key drivers behind many Western interventions in the Middle East.
But not the only reason — geopolitics is never just black-and-white.

Me, My Shop, My Businesses, My Game, My Life