Me, My Shop, My Businesses, My Game, My Life: ENGINEERING BACKGROUND

Senin, 14 Juli 2025

ENGINEERING BACKGROUND

Your #1 talent is creating wealth through innovative, creative, and high-value business ventures, ideally where you merge culture, beauty, strategy, and tech. IT is supportive but not your main stage—your main stage is making value that others can’t resist paying for, in a creative or strategic way. ( Found out 7 January 2026 )

💡 Key Pattern:
Your chart energy attracts people who value beauty, uniqueness, culture, and innovation. If you combine these in a product, service, or experience, people naturally feel it’s worth paying premium for.

Back 🔙 to IT world 🌎 🌍

❌ BUKAN: “semua teknologi dari Amerika”

✅ LEBIH TEPAT:

Amerika menyusun platform, standar, dan ekosistem

🧩 Cara melihatnya (ini kuncinya)

1️⃣ Ide & fondasi → banyak dari Eropa

Matematika (Jerman, Prancis)
Logika, algoritma, struktur
Pascal, ALGOL, teori komputasi

➡️ Tanpa Eropa, tidak ada fondasi berpikir

2️⃣ Implementasi & skala besar → Amerika

Internet
OS (Unix → Linux → macOS)
Cloud, Big Tech
Bahasa industri (C, Java, C#, JS)

➡️ Amerika jago mengubah ide jadi sistem global

3️⃣ Produksi & hardware → Asia

Jepang, Korea, Taiwan, China
Chip, semikonduktor, manufaktur

➡️ Asia bikin teknologi nyata & masif

🏗️ Kenapa kelihatan “Amerika banget”?

Karena:

Standar dunia pakai bahasa Inggris
Silicon Valley jadi pusat modal & startup
OS, cloud, app store dikendalikan US companies

➡️ Jadi semua teknologi “harus lewat Amerika” supaya dipakai global

🔑 Analogi simpel

Bayangkan rumah besar:

Eropa → arsitek & blueprint
Amerika → developer & project manager
Asia → kontraktor & pabrik material

Rumahnya kolaborasi, bukan satu negara.

✨ Insight yang kena banget sama kamu

Kamu:

belajar sistem (Pascal, C++)
tertarik makna, pola, “world system”
ngerasa cocok sama kultur Amerika

Itu wajar, karena:

Amerika = tempat ide dunia dikumpulkan, dirangkai, lalu dijual ke global

Bukan paling pintar secara teori, tapi paling jago bikin sistem hidup lama.🧠

I met someone long time ago. Random person said IT technology is my second best. Not my 1st. Based on natal chart 📉 can you check my 1st best? ( 2005 )

Ah, got it! You want to see what your “#1 best” field or talent is based on your natal chart, since IT was said to be your second-best. Let's carefully look at your birth info you shared before:

7th house: Virgo (ruler Mercury in Taurus in 3rd house)
Mars: 4th house in Gemini
Moon: 8th house in Libra
North Node: 2nd house in Aries (Venus and Jupiter on it)

Here’s how I analyze your “#1 best” area:

North Node in 2nd house in Aries with Venus and Jupiter
- The 2nd house is resources, self-worth, and earning potential.
- Aries gives initiative, leadership, courage, and originality.
- Venus + Jupiter amplify talent, attraction, and abundance.
✅ This strongly suggests that your #1 strength is creating value, earning, and building wealth in a field where you are a pioneer or trendsetter. So your best field is related to business, entrepreneurship, or innovation where you can express creativity and make money.
Mars in 4th house in Gemini
- Gemini Mars = versatile, curious, adaptable energy.
- 4th house = home, foundations, family, inner security.
- Suggests your energy thrives in areas where communication, learning, and versatility connect with stability or legacy.
Moon in 8th house in Libra
- Emotional fulfillment comes from transformation, shared resources, partnerships.
- You’re naturally drawn to financial strategy, investments, or working in synergy with others.
Ascendant Pisces
- You have intuition, creativity, and spiritual perception, which supports creative entrepreneurship, art, or service-oriented business.

🔹 Conclusion: Your #1 best

Based on your chart, your #1 strongest field is creative entrepreneurship or business in high-value areas, especially:

Creating products or services that are innovative, aesthetic, or culturally rich
Wealth-building and resource management, possibly combining tech + creativity
Leadership in projects that merge intuition, art, and commerce

💡 IT is second-best because you have technical understanding, but your true star is business creation, entrepreneurship, or a creative wealth-building field.

Yes — engineering consistently ranks among the hardest fields of study worldwide.

Here’s why it’s considered so tough:

🔹 Heavy workload → Lots of courses in math, physics, chemistry, plus specialized subjects (mechanics, circuits, programming, etc.).
🔹 Problem-solving intensity → Assignments and exams require applying theory to complex problems, not just memorizing.
🔹 Time commitment → Labs, projects, and group work take many hours outside class.
🔹 High standards → Mistakes in design or calculations can have serious real-world consequences, so precision is stressed.

📊 In many “hardest majors” rankings (U.S. & global), engineering often places in the top 5, alongside:

Medicine
Law
Architecture
Pharmacy
Chartered accountancy

Within engineering, some branches are especially notorious for difficulty:

Chemical Engineering → lots of chemistry + math + thermodynamics.
Electrical Engineering → very math-heavy and abstract.
Civil / Mechanical Engineering → demanding projects and practical applications.

👉 The upside: engineers are highly employable and usually earn above-average salaries.

The phrase “engineer brain” isn’t an official term, but it’s used informally to describe the mindset or way of thinking typical of engineers 🧠🔧.

It usually means:

Logical and analytical → breaking things into steps, focusing on how things work.
Problem-solving oriented → always looking for efficient solutions.
Systematic → prefers structure, planning, and processes.
Detail-focused → notices small technical issues others might ignore.
Sometimes overly literal / practical → can miss emotional or abstract angles because they’re focused on function.

👉 Example usage:

“He immediately started drawing diagrams to solve it — total engineer brain.”
“Her engineer brain couldn’t stop figuring out how the machine worked.”

It can be a compliment (smart, practical) or said jokingly (too rational, missing the “human” side).

💡 In short: Moving or spending time in the US dramatically increases your chances of building global-scale wealth, especially if you combine:
your skills + networks + scalable ideas

Yes — location matters a lot when it comes to becoming ultra-rich, but not always in the obvious way. Here’s why:

1. Economic Environment

Countries with strong, stable economies provide:
- Access to capital (banks, investors, venture funds)
- Scalable markets (large domestic demand or export potential)
- Supportive legal and business frameworks
Examples: US, China, Germany, UK, Singapore.

2. Access to Networks

Being in financial and tech hubs gives exposure to investors, mentors, and partnerships.
Silicon Valley, New York, London, Shanghai — these locations accelerate wealth creation.

3. Regulatory & Political Factors

Countries with freedom for entrepreneurship encourage risk-taking.
High taxation, bureaucracy, or corruption can limit self-made wealth, even if talent exists.
Russia’s oligarchs became rich after privatization, but scaling globally is harder due to politics and sanctions.

4. Language & Global Reach

Being in an English-speaking environment or having English fluency multiplies opportunities.
Countries like the US or UK dominate because global business uses English as the main language.

5. Cultural / Social Factors

Societies valuing innovation, education, and entrepreneurship nurture self-made billionaires.
In contrast, some countries emphasize security over risk, which favors inheritance wealth rather than creating new wealth.

💡 In short:
Location affects opportunity, network, scalability, and global influence. That’s why the US and China dominate self-made billionaire lists, while countries with talent but restrictive systems (like Russia, much of Africa, or parts of South America) produce fewer global ultra-rich.

Ah! You want to know the typical background of the ultra-rich globally—like family, education, and early life. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Family / Upbringing

Wealthy families (inherited):
- Many billionaires are heirs of large business empires (e.g., Walmart, L’Oréal, Samsung).
- They often inherit capital, networks, and opportunities.
Self-made wealthy:
- Most tech billionaires (Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates) grew up in middle-class or upper-middle-class families.
- Access to education, supportive environment, and early exposure to business or tech is common.

Insight: Total poverty rarely produces extreme wealth; a stable, resource-rich upbringing increases chances.

2. Education

Many ultra-rich have high-level education, often in:
- STEM fields: Computer science, engineering, biotech.
- Business / finance: Economics, MBA programs.
- Some dropped out (e.g., Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg) but had early tech exposure and skills.
Attending elite schools or universities often provides networking advantage.

3. Early Interests / Skills

Entrepreneurship from a young age: Many started businesses or projects in their teens.
Tech-savvy: Coding, engineering, or design skills are common among self-made tech billionaires.
Problem-solving mindset: Spotting gaps in the market, creating scalable solutions.

4. Geography / Language

Most ultra-rich are from or operate in countries with strong economies: US, China, Germany, UK, India.
English fluency dominates global wealth networks.
Multilingual skills are a plus but not mandatory.

5. Personality / Traits

Risk-takers, visionaries, persistent, and often willing to work long hours.
Many are curious and strategic, not just lucky.
Some are introverted (Bill Gates) while others are charismatic (Richard Branson).

In short, a typical ultra-rich background often combines:

Stable or moderately wealthy family
Strong education, often STEM or business
Early entrepreneurial or technical skill development
Access to global networks (language + geography)
High-risk tolerance and vision

💰 Economics Background – Strong in Business, Finance, and Policy

✅ Why Economics Can Lead to Wealth:

Deep understanding of markets, money, and policy.
Often leads to careers in finance, banking, investment, or consulting.
Can help people build empires through strategic decisions, not necessarily by creating new tech.

🏆 Rich & Powerful People with Economics Background:

Name	Degree in	Known For
Warren Buffett	Economics (University of Nebraska, then Columbia)	One of the greatest investors ever
Michael Bloomberg	Economics + MBA	Bloomberg LP, former NYC mayor
David Rubenstein	Economics	Co-founder of Carlyle Group (private equity)
Meg Whitman	Economics + MBA	Former CEO of eBay and HP
Sheryl Sandberg	Economics (Harvard)	COO of Facebook

💡 Common Paths to Wealth:

Investment banking
Hedge funds / private equity
Consulting (e.g., McKinsey, BCG)
High-level corporate leadership
Startup founders with economic strategy strength

📚 Education Background – Rare for Billionaires, But Powerful in Impact

✅ Why Education Background Isn’t Common for Billionaires:

Careers in teaching, academia, or educational leadership typically don’t pay as high.
Focus is usually on knowledge sharing, not wealth-building.

But: Some who start in education move into entrepreneurship, writing, or educational innovation, which can be very lucrative.

🏆 Notable Figures:

Name	Background	Known For
Salman Khan	Education + Engineering	Founder of Khan Academy (nonprofit, but impactful)
Oprah Winfrey	Studied education-related subjects	Built a media empire with a strong education mission
Sugata Mitra	Education & Technology	Educational innovator (Hole in the Wall project)

💡 Paths to Influence (not always wealth):

EdTech entrepreneurship (online learning platforms, apps)
Writing best-selling books / motivational speaking
Educational consulting or private institutions
Government or NGO work in education policy

🔍 Summary Comparison:

Field	Wealth Potential	Common Path to Riches	Risk Level	Creative Freedom
Engineering	Very High	Create tech products or startups	High	Very High
Economics	High	Finance, investing, corporate leadership	Medium	Medium-High
Education	Low (directly)	EdTech, media, speaking, publishing	Low	High (if innovative)

🤔 Final Thoughts:

Engineering builds systems.
Economics understands systems.
Education transforms people.

Yes, many of the world’s richest people have backgrounds in engineering — especially in fields like software, electrical, mechanical, and computer engineering. Here's why and who:

✅ Why Engineering Produces Rich People:

Problem-Solving Mindset:
Engineers are trained to solve complex problems — the same mindset used to build scalable businesses or technologies.
Tech Revolution:
The world’s most valuable companies (like Apple, Google, Tesla) are tech-based. Engineers often create the tools, platforms, or systems that become billion-dollar solutions.
Build vs. Manage:
Engineers can build products themselves, giving them an edge over people who only know management or theory.
Startup Culture:
Engineers often start tech companies or platform-based businesses that scale globally with relatively low cost after launch.

🏆 Examples of Richest People with Engineering Backgrounds:

Name	Field & Degree	Known For
Elon Musk	Physics + Economics (some engineering)	Tesla, SpaceX
Jeff Bezos	Electrical & Computer Engineering (Princeton)	Amazon
Larry Page	Computer Engineering (PhD Stanford)	Co-founder of Google
Sergey Brin	Computer Science	Co-founder of Google
Bill Gates	Dropped out of Harvard (studied Math & CS)	Microsoft
Mark Zuckerberg	Dropped out of Harvard (CS)	Facebook (Meta)
Mukesh Ambani	Chemical Engineering	Reliance Industries
Carlos Slim	Civil Engineering	Telecom in Latin America

⚙️ Engineering Fields Most Linked to Wealth:

Software / Computer Engineering
Electrical / Electronics
Mechanical / Industrial Engineering
Chemical Engineering (especially in energy/petroleum sectors)

🧠 Not Just Engineering, But Innovation

It’s not the degree alone that made them rich — it’s what they did with it:

Solving global problems
Innovating in tech
Scaling ideas into businesses